↓ Skip to main content

Predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory medicine: back to the future

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory medicine: back to the future
Published in
Genome Medicine, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/gm178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles Auffray, Dominique Charron, Leroy Hood

Abstract

The pioneering work of Jean Dausset on the HLA system established several principles that were later reflected in the Human Genome Project and contributed to the foundations of predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory (P4) medicine. To effectively develop systems medicine, we should take advantage of the lessons of the HLA saga, emphasizing the importance of exploring a fascinating but mysterious biology, now using systems principles, pioneering new technology developments and creating shared biological and information resources.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Sweden 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 126 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 9%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 10 7%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 29 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Computer Science 10 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 34 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,951,211
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#435
of 1,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,781
of 103,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.