You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementing a stepped-care approach in primary care: results of a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerdien Franx, Matthijs Oud, Jacomine de Lange, Michel Wensing, Richard Grol |
| Abstract |
Since 2004, 'stepped-care models' have been adopted in several international evidence-based clinical guidelines to guide clinicians in the organisation of depression care. To enhance the adoption of this new treatment approach, a Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC) was initiated in the Netherlands. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 19% |
| Unknown | 33 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 27% |
| Psychology | 53 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 40 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2014.
All research outputs
#8,295,322
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,269
of 1,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,029
of 254,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.