↓ Skip to main content

Oximes for acute organophosphate pesticide poisoning

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oximes for acute organophosphate pesticide poisoning
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005085.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nick A Buckley, Michael Eddleston, Yi Li, Marc Bevan, Jane Robertson

Abstract

Acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning causes tens of thousands of deaths each year across the developing world. Standard treatment involves administration of intravenous atropine and oxime to reactivate inhibited acetylcholinesterase. The clinical usefulness of oximes, such as pralidoxime and obidoxime, has been challenged over the past 20 years by physicians in many parts of the world.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 222 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 12%
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Postgraduate 21 9%
Other 20 9%
Researcher 20 9%
Other 53 23%
Unknown 57 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 6%
Psychology 13 6%
Chemistry 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 30 13%
Unknown 65 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,157,610
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,379
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,117
of 118,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.