↓ Skip to main content

In situ growth in early lung adenocarcinoma may represent precursor growth or invasive clone outgrowth—a clinically relevant distinction

Overview of attention for article published in Modern Pathology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
In situ growth in early lung adenocarcinoma may represent precursor growth or invasive clone outgrowth—a clinically relevant distinction
Published in
Modern Pathology, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41379-019-0257-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Allan Moore, Marco Sereno, Madhumita Das, Juvenal Dario Baena Acevedo, Samantha Sinnadurai, Claire Smith, Abi McSweeney, Xiaoyu Su, Leah Officer, Carolyn Jones, Kate Dudek, David Guttery, Phillipe Taniere, Ruth V. Spriggs, John Le Quesne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 33%
Computer Science 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,883,221
of 14,011,199 outputs
Outputs from Modern Pathology
#1,606
of 2,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,311
of 264,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Modern Pathology
#41
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,011,199 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.