You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Earth history and the passerine superradiation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1813206116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carl H Oliveros, Daniel J Field, Daniel T Ksepka, F Keith Barker, Alexandre Aleixo, Michael J Andersen, Per Alström, Brett W Benz, Edward L Braun, Michael J Braun, Gustavo A Bravo, Robb T Brumfield, R Terry Chesser, Santiago Claramunt, Joel Cracraft, Andrés M Cuervo, Elizabeth P Derryberry, Travis C Glenn, Michael G Harvey, Peter A Hosner, Leo Joseph, Rebecca T Kimball, Andrew L Mack, Colin M Miskelly, A Townsend Peterson, Mark B Robbins, Frederick H Sheldon, Luís Fábio Silveira, Brian Tilston Smith, Noor D White, Robert G Moyle, Brant C Faircloth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 316 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 78 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 22 | 7% |
| Colombia | 18 | 6% |
| Canada | 11 | 3% |
| Brazil | 8 | 3% |
| Spain | 7 | 2% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| Japan | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 36 | 11% |
| Unknown | 119 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 163 | 52% |
| Scientists | 142 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 500 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 500 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 15% |
| Researcher | 75 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 72 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 6% |
| Other | 83 | 17% |
| Unknown | 99 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 221 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 57 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 42 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 23 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 34 | 7% |
| Unknown | 118 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 411. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#73,028
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,755
of 103,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,442
of 365,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#46
of 1,006 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,006 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.