↓ Skip to main content

Exploring new landmarks: analysis of Twitter usage during the 41st ESNR Annual Meeting

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 635)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring new landmarks: analysis of Twitter usage during the 41st ESNR Annual Meeting
Published in
Neuroradiology, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00234-019-02193-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gennaro D’Anna, N. Pyatigorskaya, A. Appelman, J. Van Goethem, M. Smits

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,051,912
of 13,047,699 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#15
of 635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,663
of 249,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,047,699 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.