↓ Skip to main content

Exploring new landmarks: analysis of Twitter usage during the 41st ESNR Annual Meeting

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 609)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring new landmarks: analysis of Twitter usage during the 41st ESNR Annual Meeting
Published in
Neuroradiology, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00234-019-02193-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gennaro D’Anna, N. Pyatigorskaya, A. Appelman, J. Van Goethem, M. Smits

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,784,835
of 12,802,120 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#30
of 609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,615
of 164,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,802,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 609 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.