You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Meat as benign, meat as risk: Mapping news discourse of an ambiguous issue
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Poetics, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.poetic.2019.03.001 |
| Authors |
Tyler Bateman, Shyon Baumann, Josée Johnston |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 19 | 36% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,839,027
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Poetics
#152
of 547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,221
of 362,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Poetics
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.