↓ Skip to main content

An environment conducive to mistakes? Lessons learnt from the attack on the Médecins Sans Frontières hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan

Overview of attention for article published in International Review of the Red Cross, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
An environment conducive to mistakes? Lessons learnt from the attack on the Médecins Sans Frontières hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan
Published in
International Review of the Red Cross, April 2019
DOI 10.1017/s1816383118000619
Authors

Françoise Bouchet-Saulnier, Jonathan Whittall

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 40%
Social Sciences 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,638,466
of 14,181,233 outputs
Outputs from International Review of the Red Cross
#52
of 312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,441
of 264,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Review of the Red Cross
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,181,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 312 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.