↓ Skip to main content

Global warming impairs stock–recruitment dynamics of corals

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
358 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
609 Mendeley
Title
Global warming impairs stock–recruitment dynamics of corals
Published in
Nature, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1081-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Terry P. Hughes, James T. Kerry, Andrew H. Baird, Sean R. Connolly, Tory J. Chase, Andreas Dietzel, Tessa Hill, Andrew S. Hoey, Mia O. Hoogenboom, Mizue Jacobson, Ailsa Kerswell, Joshua S. Madin, Abbie Mieog, Allison S. Paley, Morgan S. Pratchett, Gergely Torda, Rachael M. Woods

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,148 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 609 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 609 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 101 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 98 16%
Student > Bachelor 80 13%
Researcher 78 13%
Other 23 4%
Other 69 11%
Unknown 160 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 148 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 129 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 37 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 6%
Engineering 10 2%
Other 61 10%
Unknown 189 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3696. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,449
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#141
of 98,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15
of 366,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#4
of 1,041 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,041 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.