↓ Skip to main content

Global warming impairs stock–recruitment dynamics of corals

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 70,299)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
Global warming impairs stock–recruitment dynamics of corals
Published in
Nature, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1081-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Terry P. Hughes, James T. Kerry, Andrew H. Baird, Sean R. Connolly, Tory J. Chase, Andreas Dietzel, Tessa Hill, Andrew S. Hoey, Mia O. Hoogenboom, Mizue Jacobson, Ailsa Kerswell, Joshua S. Madin, Abbie Mieog, Allison S. Paley, Morgan S. Pratchett, Gergely Torda, Rachael M. Woods

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,813 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 191 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 25%
Student > Master 35 18%
Researcher 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Unspecified 21 11%
Other 33 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 65 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 26%
Unspecified 32 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 7%
Other 15 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4044. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#115
of 13,644,855 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#26
of 70,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8
of 255,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#4
of 948 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,644,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 948 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.