↓ Skip to main content

Global warming impairs stock–recruitment dynamics of corals

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 74,079)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
Title
Global warming impairs stock–recruitment dynamics of corals
Published in
Nature, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1081-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Terry P. Hughes, James T. Kerry, Andrew H. Baird, Sean R. Connolly, Tory J. Chase, Andreas Dietzel, Tessa Hill, Andrew S. Hoey, Mia O. Hoogenboom, Mizue Jacobson, Ailsa Kerswell, Joshua S. Madin, Abbie Mieog, Allison S. Paley, Morgan S. Pratchett, Gergely Torda, Rachael M. Woods

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,785 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 292 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 23%
Student > Master 50 17%
Researcher 40 14%
Student > Bachelor 40 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 44 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 93 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 7%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 56 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4088. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2020.
All research outputs
#293
of 15,184,553 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#41
of 74,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9
of 268,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#4
of 948 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,184,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 82.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 948 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.