↓ Skip to main content

Oral Contraceptive Use and Risk of Early-Onset Breast Cancer in Carriers and Noncarriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral Contraceptive Use and Risk of Early-Onset Breast Cancer in Carriers and Noncarriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, February 2005
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-04-0376
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger L. Milne, Julia A. Knight, Esther M. John, Gillian S. Dite, Ronald Balbuena, Argyrios Ziogas, Irene L. Andrulis, Dee W. West, Frederick P. Li, Melissa C. Southey, Graham G. Giles, Margaret R.E. McCredie, John L. Hopper, Alice S. Whittemore, for the Breast Cancer Family Registry

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Mathematics 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2024.
All research outputs
#5,164,033
of 26,680,103 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#1,368
of 4,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,309
of 77,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#26
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,680,103 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.