You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Erratum: Corrigendum: Identification of high-quality cancer prognostic markers and metastasis network modules
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1038/ncomms1400 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jie Li, Anne E.G. Lenferink, Yinghai Deng, Catherine Collins, Qinghua Cui, Enrico O. Purisima, Maureen D. O'Connor-McCourt, Edwin Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 17% |
Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2012.
All research outputs
#18,304,230
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#43,705
of 46,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,944
of 247,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#122
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.