↓ Skip to main content

Inhaled short acting beta2-agonist use in chronic asthma: regular versus as needed treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhaled short acting beta2-agonist use in chronic asthma: regular versus as needed treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001285
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Haydn Walters, Julia AE Walters, Peter G Gibson, Paul Jones

Abstract

Inhaled short-acting beta-2 agonists are the major class of bronchodilators used for relief of symptoms in asthma. There has been concern that excessive uncontrolled use of beta-2 agonists might have contributed to rises in asthma mortality seen in some countries. International consensus guidelines now generally recommend using short-acting beta-2 agonists only for relief of symptoms on an as needed basis. To assess the effects of using short-acting inhaled beta-2 agonists regularly or only on demand in asthmatic adults and children on indices of asthma control. Searches were carried out of the Cochrane Airways Group "Asthma and Wheez* RCT" register in 1997, 1999 and 2002. Pharmaceutical companies and researchers with an interest in the area were asked directly for details of any studies that they knew of. Randomised controlled trials in which the short-acting beta-2 agonist was given regularly in the experimental group, together with an inhaled bronchodilator for relief of symptoms ('rescue use'). The control group consisted of matching placebo inhaled regularly, with an inhaled bronchodilator for 'rescue use'. Data were extracted and quality assessments were made by both reviewers. Parallel group and cross-over trials were analysed separately. Where possible data were pooled using a fixed effects model. 800 abstracts were identified for the first version and 60 papers were requested for full assessment. In this update 15 studies were added to the 34 trials which met the entry criteria for the first version in 2000. No clinically or statistically significant differences were found in airway calibre measurements. The regular treatment groups required less rescue medication, -0.80 puffs/24 hours (95% CI -0.07 to -1.30) and -0.42 puffs/daytime (95% CI -0.12 to -0.72), and had fewer days with asthma symptoms, -6.7% (95% CI -2.7 to -10.7). There was no significant difference in the odds ratio for the occurrence of at least one major asthma exacerbation either in parallel group or cross over studies. In general, these results support current guidelines, although it has given reassuring evidence against concerns over regular use of inhaled short-acting beta-2 agonists.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 147 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 4%
Other 5 3%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 59 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Psychology 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 62 41%