↓ Skip to main content

What are the effects of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on boreal forest biodiversity in Fennoscandia and European Russia? A systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What are the effects of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on boreal forest biodiversity in Fennoscandia and European Russia? A systematic review protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13750-019-0160-8
Authors

Sini Savilaakso, Matti Häkkilä, Anna Johansson, Anne Uusitalo, Terhi Sandgren, Mikko Mönkkönen, Pasi Puttonen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,238,078
of 22,641,687 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#196
of 299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,842
of 349,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,641,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.