↓ Skip to main content

Public health: The toxic truth about sugar

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
355 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
765 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Public health: The toxic truth about sugar
Published in
Nature, February 2012
DOI 10.1038/482027a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert H. Lustig, Laura A. Schmidt, Claire D. Brindis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,533 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 765 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Germany 6 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Czech Republic 1 <1%
Other 11 1%
Unknown 721 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 103 13%
Student > Bachelor 91 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 10%
Researcher 66 9%
Other 33 4%
Other 139 18%
Unknown 259 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 135 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 96 13%
Unspecified 48 6%
Social Sciences 30 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 3%
Other 173 23%
Unknown 259 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1522. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,196
of 12,373,386 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#215
of 64,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9
of 223,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#3
of 1,025 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,025 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.