↓ Skip to main content

Group formation and cohesion of active particles with visual perception–dependent motility

Overview of attention for article published in Science, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
28 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Group formation and cohesion of active particles with visual perception–dependent motility
Published in
Science, April 2019
DOI 10.1126/science.aau5347
Pubmed ID
Authors

François A. Lavergne, Hugo Wendehenne, Tobias Bäuerle, Clemens Bechinger

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 29%
Researcher 10 17%
Professor 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 24 41%
Engineering 10 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 9 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2019.
All research outputs
#241,260
of 14,157,240 outputs
Outputs from Science
#7,969
of 63,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,642
of 264,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#416
of 1,205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,157,240 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.