↓ Skip to main content

Blood transfusion for treating malarial anaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blood transfusion for treating malarial anaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 1999
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001475
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin M Meremikwu, Helen J Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 49 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 21%
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Unspecified 4 8%
Other 17 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 60%
Unspecified 8 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 4 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#7,527,715
of 13,589,098 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,297
of 10,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,939
of 255,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,589,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.