↓ Skip to main content

Microwear and isotopic analyses on cave bear remains from Toll Cave reveal both short-term and long-term dietary habits

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
43 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microwear and isotopic analyses on cave bear remains from Toll Cave reveal both short-term and long-term dietary habits
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-42152-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iván Ramírez-Pedraza, Carlos Tornero, Spyridoula Pappa, Sahra Talamo, Domingo C. Salazar-García, Ruth Blasco, Jordi Rosell, Florent Rivals

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 39%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Other 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 6 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 8 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2020.
All research outputs
#572,321
of 17,429,432 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#6,396
of 93,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,098
of 277,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,429,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them