You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Microwear and isotopic analyses on cave bear remains from Toll Cave reveal both short-term and long-term dietary habits
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-42152-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Iván Ramírez-Pedraza, Carlos Tornero, Spyridoula Pappa, Sahra Talamo, Domingo C. Salazar-García, Ruth Blasco, Jordi Rosell, Florent Rivals |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 19 | 44% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
France | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 15 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 29 | 67% |
Scientists | 12 | 28% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Professor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 9 | 18% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 20 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2020.
All research outputs
#948,939
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#9,937
of 142,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,683
of 366,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#295
of 4,038 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,038 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.