↓ Skip to main content

Non-legislative interventions for the promotion of cycle helmet wearing by children.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-legislative interventions for the promotion of cycle helmet wearing by children.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003985.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Owen R, Kendrick D, Mulvaney C, Coleman T, Royal S, Rachel Owen, Denise Kendrick, Caroline Mulvaney, Tim Coleman, Simon Royal, Owen, Rachel, Kendrick, Denise, Mulvaney, Caroline, Coleman, Tim, Royal, Simon

Abstract

Helmets reduce bicycle-related head injuries, particularly in single vehicle crashes and those where the head strikes the ground. We aimed to identify non-legislative interventions for promoting helmet use among children, so future interventions can be designed on a firm evidence base.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
United States 3 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 132 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 22%
Student > Master 27 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Other 11 8%
Other 41 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 38%
Social Sciences 25 17%
Unspecified 16 11%
Psychology 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Other 28 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2017.
All research outputs
#452,706
of 12,262,017 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,219
of 8,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,025
of 242,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 469 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,262,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 469 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.