↓ Skip to main content

Swine Influenza

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 195: Swine Influenza Viruses: An Asian Perspective.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Swine Influenza Viruses: An Asian Perspective.
Chapter number 195
Book title
Swine Influenza
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/82_2011_195
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-236870-7, 978-3-64-236871-4
Authors

Choi YK, Pascua PN, Song MS, Young-Ki Choi, Philippe Noriel Q. Pascua, Min-Suk Song, Choi, Young-Ki, Pascua, Philippe Noriel Q., Song, Min-Suk

Abstract

Swine influenza viruses (SIVs) are respiratory viral pathogens of pigs that are capable of causing serious global public health concerns in human. Because of their dual susceptibility to mammalian and avian influenza A viruses, pigs are the leading intermediate hosts for genetic reassortment and interspecies transmission and serve as reservoirs of antigenically divergent human viruses from which zoonotic stains with pandemic potential may arise. Pandemic influenza viruses emerging after the 1918 Spanish flu have originated in asia. Although distinct lineages of North American and European SIVs of the H1N1, H3N2, and HiN2 subtypes have been widely studied, less is known about the porcine viruses that are circulating among pig populations throughout Asia. The current review understanding of Contemporary viruses, human infection with SIVs, and the potential threat of novel pandemic strains are described, Furthermore, to best use the limited resources that are available for comprehensive genetic assessment of influenza, consensus efforts among Asian nations to increase epidemiosurveillance of swine herds is also strongly promoted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 31%
Professor 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Researcher 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2012.
All research outputs
#15,241,801
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#446
of 671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,003
of 246,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.