↓ Skip to main content

The evolution and phylodynamics of serotype A and SAT2 foot-and-mouth disease viruses in endemic regions of Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The evolution and phylodynamics of serotype A and SAT2 foot-and-mouth disease viruses in endemic regions of Africa
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-41995-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Lycett, V. N. Tanya, M. Hall, D. P. King, S. Mazeri, V. Mioulet, N. J. Knowles, J. Wadsworth, K. Bachanek-Bankowska, Victor Ngu Ngwa, K. L. Morgan, B. M. de C. Bronsvoort

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 21 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2021.
All research outputs
#12,930,488
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#55,300
of 125,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,043
of 351,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,939
of 4,032 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,032 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.