Title |
Does the store‐turnover method still provide a useful guide to food intakes in Aboriginal communities?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, October 2006
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2006.tb00461.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julie Brimblecombe, Dorothy Mackerras, Pennie Clifford, Kerin O'Dea |
Abstract |
To consider the application of the store-turnover method as a guide to assess food intake in remote Aboriginal communities. Food sources in a remote Aboriginal island community were documented. The contribution of quantifiable food sources to total community-level fresh fruit and vegetable availability was determined. The store remains the single largest supplier of fruit and vegetables overall (54%), however its contribution varies depending on the subpopulation of interest. A store-turnover alone may significantly underestimate community-level dietary intake, depending on the contribution of other food sources. Changes in the food supply in remote communities, coupled with methodological complexities inherent in the store-turnover method, challenge its application in a contemporary context. A simplified version of the store-turnover method is needed that could be widely applied by community people and health practitioners seeking to initiate and monitor interventions to improve diet quality. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 20% |