↓ Skip to main content

Nutrient adequacy and diet quality in a Mediterranean population with metabolic syndrome: A cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Nutrition, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutrient adequacy and diet quality in a Mediterranean population with metabolic syndrome: A cross-sectional study
Published in
Clinical Nutrition, March 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.03.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria del Mar Bibiloni, Cristina Bouzas, Manuela Abbate, Miguel A. Martínez-González, Dolores Corella, Jordi Salas-Salvadó, M. Dolors Zomeño, Jesús Vioque, Dora Romaguera, J. Alfredo Martínez, Julia Wärnberg, José López-Miranda, Ramón Estruch, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, Ángel Alonso-Gómez, Francisco Tinahones, Lluis Serra-Majem, Vicente Martín, José Lapetra, Clotilde Vázquez, Xavier Pintó, Josep Vidal, Lidia Daimiel, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez, Pilar Matía, Emilio Ros, Rebeca Fernández-Carrión, Antonio Garcia-Rios, M. Angeles Zulet, Alberto Asensio, Helmut Schröder, Montserrat Fitó, Nerea Becerra-Tomás, Josep Basora, Juan Carlos Cenoz, Javier Diez-Espino, Estefanía Toledo, Josep A. Tur

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 17%
Librarian 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,298,906
of 13,543,741 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Nutrition
#688
of 2,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,726
of 255,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Nutrition
#42
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,543,741 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.