↓ Skip to main content

What factors affect the carriage of epinephrine auto‐injectors by teenagers?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What factors affect the carriage of epinephrine auto‐injectors by teenagers?
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/2045-7022-2-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare Macadam, Julie Barnett, Graham Roberts, Gary Stiefel, Rosemary King, Michel Erlewyn-Lajeunesse, Judith A Holloway, Jane S Lucas

Abstract

Teenagers with allergies are at particular risk of severe and fatal reactions, but epinephrine auto-injectors are not always carried as prescribed. We investigated barriers to carriage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 20%
Other 8 17%
Researcher 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 33%
Psychology 5 11%
Design 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,596,044
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#142
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,480
of 253,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.