↓ Skip to main content

Confucianism and Capitalist Development: From Max Weber and Orientalism to Lee Kuan Yew and New Confucianism

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Studies Review, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Confucianism and Capitalist Development: From Max Weber and Orientalism to Lee Kuan Yew and New Confucianism
Published in
Asian Studies Review, April 2019
DOI 10.1080/10357823.2019.1590685
Authors

Sophie Pezzutto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 63%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,322,197
of 14,704,030 outputs
Outputs from Asian Studies Review
#51
of 362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,482
of 266,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Studies Review
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,704,030 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 362 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.