↓ Skip to main content

A symmetric toggle switch explains the onset of random X inactivation in different mammals

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
70 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A symmetric toggle switch explains the onset of random X inactivation in different mammals
Published in
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41594-019-0214-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Verena Mutzel, Ikuhiro Okamoto, Ilona Dunkel, Mitinori Saitou, Luca Giorgetti, Edith Heard, Edda G. Schulz

Abstract

Gene-regulatory networks control the establishment and maintenance of alternative gene-expression states during development. A particular challenge is the acquisition of opposing states by two copies of the same gene, as in the case of the long non-coding RNA Xist in mammals at the onset of random X-chromosome inactivation (XCI). The regulatory principles that lead to stable mono-allelic expression of Xist remain unknown. Here, we uncover the minimal regulatory network that can ensure female-specific and mono-alleleic upregulation of Xist, by combining mathematical modeling and experimental validation of central model predictions. We identify a symmetric toggle switch as the basis for random mono-allelic upregulation of Xist, which reproduces data from several mutant, aneuploid and polyploid mouse cell lines with various Xist expression patterns. Moreover, this toggle switch explains the diversity of strategies employed by different species at the onset of XCI. In addition to providing a unifying conceptual framework with which to explore XCI across mammals, our study sets the stage for identifying the molecular mechanisms needed to initiate random XCI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#519,112
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#140
of 4,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,687
of 366,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#3
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.