You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Humanitarian health programming and monitoring in inaccessible conflict settings: a literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of International Humanitarian Action, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41018-019-0055-x |
| Authors |
Simran Chaudhri, Kristina Cordes, Nathan Miller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Senegal | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 23 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,022,082
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#53
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,709
of 352,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Humanitarian Action
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.