You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gene correction for SCID-X1 in long-term hematopoietic stem cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-09614-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mara Pavel-Dinu, Volker Wiebking, Beruh T. Dejene, Waracharee Srifa, Sruthi Mantri, Carmencita E. Nicolas, Ciaran Lee, Gang Bao, Eric J. Kildebeck, Niraj Punjya, Camille Sindhu, Matthew A. Inlay, Nivedita Saxena, Suk See DeRavin, Harry Malech, Maria Grazia Roncarolo, Kenneth I. Weinberg, Matthew H. Porteus |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
| Russia | 2 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 67% |
| Scientists | 6 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 240 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 73 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 72 | 30% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 23 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 75 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 394. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2022.
All research outputs
#75,355
of 25,046,511 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#1,140
of 55,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,488
of 359,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#24
of 1,325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,511 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.