↓ Skip to main content

Sexual ornaments but not weapons trade off against testes size in primates

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 7,645)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
38 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
161 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sexual ornaments but not weapons trade off against testes size in primates
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2019
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2018.2542
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Lüpold, Leigh W. Simmons, Cyril C. Grueter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 161 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Master 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 49%
Unspecified 8 22%
Psychology 4 11%
Engineering 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 419. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#24,232
of 13,769,756 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#49
of 7,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#825
of 257,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,769,756 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.