You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, James L. Buxbaum, Syed M. Abbas Fehmi, Shahnaz Sultan, Douglas S. Fishman, Bashar J. Qumseya, Victoria K. Cortessis, Hannah Schilperoort, Lynn Kysh, Lea Matsuoka, Patrick Yachimski, Deepak Agrawal, Suryakanth R. Gurudu, Laith H. Jamil, Terry L. Jue, Mouen A. Khashab, Joanna K. Law, Jeffrey K. Lee, Mariam Naveed, Mandeep S. Sawhney, Nirav Thosani, Julie Yang, Sachin B. Wani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 31% |
| Colombia | 4 | 7% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| Peru | 3 | 6% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 67% |
| Scientists | 9 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 564 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 564 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 74 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 69 | 12% |
| Researcher | 63 | 11% |
| Other | 57 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 42 | 7% |
| Other | 86 | 15% |
| Unknown | 173 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 306 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 37 | 7% |
| Unknown | 193 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,025,795
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#118
of 5,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,375
of 369,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#4
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.