You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Model-based optimal PEEP in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients in the Intensive Care Unit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-925x-10-64 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashwath Sundaresan, J Geoffrey Chase, Geoffrey M Shaw, Yeong Shiong Chiew, Thomas Desaive |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 24% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 42% |
| Engineering | 15 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,836,328
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#104
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,769
of 130,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.