↓ Skip to main content

Radix Sophorae flavescentis versus no intervention or placebo for chronic hepatitis B

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radix Sophorae flavescentis versus no intervention or placebo for chronic hepatitis B
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013089.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ning Liang, De Zhao Kong, Si Si Ma, Chun Li Lu, Ming Yang, Lu Da Feng, Chen Shen, Ruo Han Diao, Ling Jun Cui, Xing Yu Lu, Dimitrinka Nikolova, Janus C Jakobsen, Christian Gluud, Jian Ping Liu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Student > Master 6 19%
Researcher 5 16%
Librarian 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 9 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#10,604,479
of 13,941,062 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,618
of 10,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,371
of 263,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,941,062 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.