You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Radix Sophorae flavescentis versus no intervention or placebo for chronic hepatitis B
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013089.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ning Liang, De Zhao Kong, Si Si Ma, Chun Li Lu, Ming Yang, Lu Da Feng, Chen Shen, Ruo Han Diao, Ling Jun Cui, Xing Yu Lu, Dimitrinka Nikolova, Janus C Jakobsen, Christian Gluud, Jian Ping Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 201 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
Other | 16 | 8% |
Researcher | 16 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
Other | 33 | 16% |
Unknown | 75 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
Other | 22 | 11% |
Unknown | 88 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#20,830,692
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,261
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,360
of 365,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#173
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.