↓ Skip to main content

Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
62 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
4 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005004.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katja Boehm, Francesca Borrelli, Edzard Ernst, Gabi Habacher, Shao Kang Hung, Stefania Milazzo, Markus Horneber

Abstract

Tea is one of the most commonly consumed beverages worldwide. Teas from the plant Camellia sinensis can be grouped into green, black and oolong tea. Cross-culturally tea drinking habits vary. Camellia sinensis contains the active ingredient polyphenol, which has a subgroup known as catechins. Catechins are powerful antioxidants. It has been suggested that green tea polyphenol may inhibit cell proliferation and observational studies have suggested that green tea may have cancer-preventative effects.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 241 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 52 20%
Student > Master 52 20%
Researcher 33 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Unspecified 30 12%
Other 61 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 40%
Unspecified 38 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 4%
Other 52 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 164. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2019.
All research outputs
#85,683
of 13,525,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#183
of 10,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#662
of 210,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 543 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,525,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 543 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.