↓ Skip to main content

Intrinsic functional architecture of the non-human primate spinal cord derived from fMRI and electrophysiology

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Intrinsic functional architecture of the non-human primate spinal cord derived from fMRI and electrophysiology
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-09485-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tung-Lin Wu, Pai-Feng Yang, Feng Wang, Zhaoyue Shi, Arabinda Mishra, Ruiqi Wu, Li Min Chen, John C. Gore

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 42%
Researcher 3 25%
Student > Master 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 33%
Psychology 3 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,062,477
of 13,622,595 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#15,959
of 24,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,879
of 255,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,622,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them