You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intrinsic functional architecture of the non-human primate spinal cord derived from fMRI and electrophysiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-09485-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tung-Lin Wu, Pai-Feng Yang, Feng Wang, Zhaoyue Shi, Arabinda Mishra, Ruiqi Wu, Li Min Chen, John C. Gore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 31% |
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Professor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 16 | 41% |
| Engineering | 5 | 13% |
| Psychology | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,619,518
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#33,422
of 47,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,432
of 351,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#990
of 1,352 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,352 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.