You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Case report: A retrospective serological analysis indicating human exposure to tick-borne relapsing fever spirochetes in Sonora, Mexico
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007215 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Edwin Vázquez-Guerrero, Norma P. Adan-Bante, Mónica C. Mercado-Uribe, César Hernández-Rodríguez, Lourdes Villa-Tanaca, Job E. Lopez, J. Antonio Ibarra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 38% |
Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Mexico | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
Scientists | 4 | 31% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 26% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Researcher | 2 | 9% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 13% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,726,282
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#1,094
of 9,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,280
of 367,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#21
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.