↓ Skip to main content

Ten simple rules towards healthier research labs

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 7,417)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
747 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ten simple rules towards healthier research labs
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006914
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando T. Maestre

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5,056 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 747 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 747 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 175 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 162 22%
Student > Master 77 10%
Student > Bachelor 49 7%
Professor 48 6%
Other 142 19%
Unknown 94 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 188 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 73 10%
Environmental Science 52 7%
Engineering 33 4%
Neuroscience 31 4%
Other 202 27%
Unknown 168 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,343
of 20,060,859 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#3
of 7,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16
of 285,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,060,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.