You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Environmental DNA sampling reveals high occupancy rates of invasive Burmese pythons at wading bird breeding aggregations in the central Everglades
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0213943 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sophia C. M. Orzechowski, Peter C. Frederick, Robert M. Dorazio, Margaret E. Hunter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 32 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2019.
All research outputs
#889,122
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,075
of 197,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,292
of 353,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#214
of 2,845 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,845 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.