The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Safety and Feasibility of Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Criteria to Identify Patients With “Good Prognosis” Rectal Cancer Eligible for Primary Surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Oncology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0186 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erin D. Kennedy, Marko Simunovic, Kartik Jhaveri, Richard Kirsch, Jim Brierley, Sébastien Drolet, Carl Brown, Patrick M. Vos, Wei Xiong, Tony MacLean, Selliah Kanthan, Peter Stotland, Simon Raphael, Gil Chow, Catherine A. O’Brien, Charles Cho, Cathy Streutker, Raimond Wong, Selina Schmocker, Sender Liberman, Caroline Reinhold, Neil Kopek, Victoria Marcus, Alexandre Bouchard, Caroline Lavoie, Stanislas Morin, Martine Périgny, Ann Wright, Katerina Neumann, Sharon Clarke, Nikhilesh G. Patil, Thomas Arnason, Lara Williams, Robin McLeod, Gina Brown, Alex Mathieson, Amandeep Pooni, Nancy N. Baxter |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 19% |
| Canada | 12 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 61 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 38 | 32% |
| Scientists | 19 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 33 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 40 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2023.
All research outputs
#523,779
of 26,122,087 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Oncology
#858
of 3,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,730
of 362,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Oncology
#35
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,122,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 83.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.