↓ Skip to main content

Safety and Feasibility of Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Criteria to Identify Patients With “Good Prognosis” Rectal Cancer Eligible for Primary Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Oncology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
125 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Safety and Feasibility of Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Criteria to Identify Patients With “Good Prognosis” Rectal Cancer Eligible for Primary Surgery
Published in
JAMA Oncology, July 2019
DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0186
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin D. Kennedy, Marko Simunovic, Kartik Jhaveri, Richard Kirsch, Jim Brierley, Sébastien Drolet, Carl Brown, Patrick M. Vos, Wei Xiong, Tony MacLean, Selliah Kanthan, Peter Stotland, Simon Raphael, Gil Chow, Catherine A. O’Brien, Charles Cho, Cathy Streutker, Raimond Wong, Selina Schmocker, Sender Liberman, Caroline Reinhold, Neil Kopek, Victoria Marcus, Alexandre Bouchard, Caroline Lavoie, Stanislas Morin, Martine Périgny, Ann Wright, Katerina Neumann, Sharon Clarke, Nikhilesh G. Patil, Thomas Arnason, Lara Williams, Robin McLeod, Gina Brown, Alex Mathieson, Amandeep Pooni, Nancy N. Baxter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 29%
Researcher 7 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2019.
All research outputs
#191,499
of 14,137,367 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Oncology
#455
of 1,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,853
of 264,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Oncology
#19
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,137,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 83.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.