↓ Skip to main content

ALEXA: a microarray design platform for alternative expression analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
ALEXA: a microarray design platform for alternative expression analysis
Published in
Nature Methods, February 2008
DOI 10.1038/nmeth0208-118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Griffith M, Tang MJ, Griffith OL, Morin RD, Chan SY, Asano JK, Zeng T, Flibotte S, Ally A, Baross A, Hirst M, Jones SJ, Morin GB, Tai IT, Marra MA

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 11%
France 2 7%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 22 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 39%
Researcher 10 36%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Computer Science 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,315,811
of 6,278,272 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,526
of 2,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,207
of 231,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#45
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,278,272 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.