↓ Skip to main content

Individual-Based Modeling of Amazon Forests Suggests That Climate Controls Productivity While Traits Control Demography

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individual-Based Modeling of Amazon Forests Suggests That Climate Controls Productivity While Traits Control Demography
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, April 2019
DOI 10.3389/feart.2019.00083
Authors

Sophie Fauset, Manuel Gloor, Nikolaos M. Fyllas, Oliver L. Phillips, Gregory P. Asner, Timothy R. Baker, Lisa Patrick Bentley, Roel J. W. Brienen, Bradley O. Christoffersen, Jhon del Aguila-Pasquel, Christopher E. Doughty, Ted R. Feldpausch, David R. Galbraith, Rosa C. Goodman, Cécile A. J. Girardin, Euridice N. Honorio Coronado, Abel Monteagudo, Norma Salinas, Alexander Shenkin, Javier E. Silva-Espejo, Geertje van der Heijden, Rodolfo Vasquez, Esteban Alvarez-Davila, Luzmila Arroyo, Jorcely G. Barroso, Foster Brown, Wendeson Castro, Fernando Cornejo Valverde, Nallarett Davila Cardozo, Anthony Di Fiore, Terry Erwin, Isau Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Percy Núñez Vargas, David Neill, Nadir Pallqui Camacho, Alexander Parada Gutierrez, Julie Peacock, Nigel Pitman, Adriana Prieto, Zorayda Restrepo, Agustín Rudas, Carlos A. Quesada, Marcos Silveira, Juliana Stropp, John Terborgh, Simone A. Vieira, Yadvinder Malhi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 30%
Environmental Science 22 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 11%
Engineering 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 20 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,841,100
of 15,729,358 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#187
of 1,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,766
of 272,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,729,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.