↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of intravenous lidocaine in head and neck cancer surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of intravenous lidocaine in head and neck cancer surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3303-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edris Omar, Grégoire Wallon, Christian Bauer, Grégory Axiotis, Cécile Bouix, Jean-Luc Soubirou, Frédéric Aubrun

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Unspecified 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 18 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 38%
Unspecified 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,524,852
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#358
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,150
of 367,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them