A conceptual model for understanding post-release opioid-related overdose risk
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, April 2019
Paul J. Joudrey, Maria R. Khan, Emily A. Wang, Joy D. Scheidell, E. Jennifer Edelman, D. Keith McInnes, Aaron D. Fox
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||21||78%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||7%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||4%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||28||13%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||21||10%|
|Student > Bachelor||19||9%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||13||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||32||15%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||22||11%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||3||1%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 496. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,846,849 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
of 462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 357,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,846,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.