↓ Skip to main content

Underestimation of volcanic cooling in tree-ring-based reconstructions of hemispheric temperatures

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Geoscience, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Underestimation of volcanic cooling in tree-ring-based reconstructions of hemispheric temperatures
Published in
Nature Geoscience, February 2012
DOI 10.1038/ngeo1394
Authors

Michael E. Mann, Jose D. Fuentes, Scott Rutherford

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Germany 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 207 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 24%
Student > Master 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Professor 12 5%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 25 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 93 42%
Environmental Science 61 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 8%
Physics and Astronomy 6 3%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 28 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2016.
All research outputs
#307,508
of 22,716,996 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#666
of 3,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,802
of 247,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#5
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,716,996 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 97.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.