The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Underestimation of volcanic cooling in tree-ring-based reconstructions of hemispheric temperatures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Geoscience, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ngeo1394 |
| Authors |
Michael E. Mann, Jose D. Fuentes, Scott Rutherford |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 221 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 63 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Professor | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 94 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 61 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 36 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#358,578
of 26,071,599 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#723
of 3,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,914
of 257,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#6
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,071,599 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 107.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.