↓ Skip to main content

Underestimation of volcanic cooling in tree-ring-based reconstructions of hemispheric temperatures

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Geoscience, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Underestimation of volcanic cooling in tree-ring-based reconstructions of hemispheric temperatures
Published in
Nature Geoscience, February 2012
DOI 10.1038/ngeo1394
Authors

Michael E. Mann, Jose D. Fuentes, Scott Rutherford

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Germany 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 220 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 65 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 23%
Student > Master 21 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Professor 12 5%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 32 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 94 40%
Environmental Science 62 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 8%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Physics and Astronomy 6 3%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 34 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#342,434
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#697
of 3,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,860
of 254,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#6
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.