↓ Skip to main content

Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011422.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theresa A Lawrie, Hongqian Liu, DongHao Lu, Therese Dowswell, Huan Song, Lei Wang, Gang Shi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 27 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 33%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 37 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,006,236
of 15,474,261 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,699
of 11,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,846
of 217,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,474,261 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.