You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Diagnostic value of procalcitonin and presepsin for sepsis in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40560-019-0374-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yutaka Kondo, Yutaka Umemura, Kei Hayashida, Yoshitaka Hara, Morio Aihara, Kazuma Yamakawa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 2 | 15% |
Russia | 1 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Spain | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 13 | 13% |
Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
Researcher | 6 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 16% |
Unknown | 41 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 26% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 44 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,878,152
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#91
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,008
of 365,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.