↓ Skip to main content

Hepatic late adverse effects after antineoplastic treatment for childhood cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hepatic late adverse effects after antineoplastic treatment for childhood cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008205.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renée L Mulder, Dorine Bresters, Malon Van den Hof, Bart GP Koot, Sharon M Castellino, Yoon Kong K Loke, Piet N Post, Aleida Postma, László P Szőnyi, Gill A Levitt, Edit Bardi, Roderick Skinner, Elvira C van Dalen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 147 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 21%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 41 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Psychology 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 50 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,786,692
of 18,201,284 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,318
of 11,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,922
of 224,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,201,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.