You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lending practices to same-sex borrowers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1903592116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hua Sun, Lei Gao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 52 | 47% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 49% |
| Scientists | 46 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 34% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 381. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#83,049
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,934
of 103,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,570
of 348,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#46
of 986 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 986 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.