↓ Skip to main content

Surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008765.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thuria Al Rawahi, Alberto D Lopes, Robert E Bristow, Andrew Bryant, Ahmed Elattar, Supratik Chattopadhyay, Khadra Galaal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Ecuador 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 148 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 17%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 41 26%
Unknown 19 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 25 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,762,149
of 15,666,286 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,492
of 11,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,767
of 271,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,666,286 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.