↓ Skip to main content

Proposed endocrine funding priorities for the NICHD strategic plan: expert opinion from the Pediatric Endocrine Society

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Research, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Proposed endocrine funding priorities for the NICHD strategic plan: expert opinion from the Pediatric Endocrine Society
Published in
Pediatric Research, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41390-019-0401-0
Authors

Kanakadurga Singer, Michelle L. Katz, Steven D. Mittelman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,639,787
of 13,622,595 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Research
#299
of 3,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,827
of 255,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Research
#18
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,622,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.