↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy of Valuations of Surgical Procedures in the Medicare Fee Schedule

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
56 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accuracy of Valuations of Surgical Procedures in the Medicare Fee Schedule
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2019
DOI 10.1056/nejmsa1807379
Pubmed ID
Authors

David C. Chan, Johnny Huynh, David M. Studdert

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 50%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 63%
Unspecified 1 13%
Computer Science 1 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2019.
All research outputs
#259,235
of 13,035,139 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#4,598
of 25,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,040
of 226,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#157
of 261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,035,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.