↓ Skip to main content

Mainstreaming human and large carnivore coexistence through institutional collaboration

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
44 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mainstreaming human and large carnivore coexistence through institutional collaboration
Published in
Conservation Biology, June 2019
DOI 10.1111/cobi.13334
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tibor Hartel, Ben C. Scheele, Abi Tamim Vanak, Laurențiu Rozylowicz, John D. C. Linnell, Euan G. Ritchie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 21%
Student > Master 12 12%
Other 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 32%
Environmental Science 28 28%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 18 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#482,141
of 17,520,458 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#301
of 3,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,469
of 277,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#12
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,520,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.